I think GM foods that we eat have some problems relating to environment and health for humans etc. If they are labeled and treated as a charity for poor people or animals, these problems will be able to improve more and more. Moreover an expert on GM food should play a role in notifying people about GM foods.
But I think it's hard to find that where is it start to be GM? For example, we're not directly receive chemical things but it comes from many ways such as meat, eegs, soya and milk. So it incredibly risks to make mistakes from labelling the products. Do u think?
It was really surprising that we don't know what we are eating. It is GM food or natural food that was scary and little worry about health. My option would be to ask them to label that so people will know what they are eating even if that GM food is large amount of production and it is in everyday use.
I'm completely disagree with GM food. I don't like eat "chemical" food. I come from a traditionalist family that likes to eat food of own production without adding of "medicines". The only one positive thing that I can find on GM food is that some food can be exported in places where the production is poor.
As I see it, to a large extent the GM food can promote the agricultural economics efficiently. According to the video, the transgenic technology is aim to save the growing cycle of plants, which has a considerable impact on the agriculture and market. Speeding the pace of growth would provide more products to market than nowadays. There is undoubted that it has the potential to solve hunger crisis that is happening in some poor area such as Africa.However,the opponents always draw public's attention to the safety of GM food.
Yes, the safety of the GM food is one thing. There's another problem, I believe. It would be great if GM food could be the solution for Africa. The fact is, however, most support for Africa seems to end up in wrong hands. Thanks for your comment, Khun.
It seems to me it is a counter-argument, because one of the advantages is it could provide more nutrition than unmodified foods, such as, vitamin. On the other hand, it possible to cause an unexpected allergen or allergic reaction.
After watched this films, I have been thinking about positive part in GM food like Kun. Because scientist was thinking when they did researching. So I tried looking for bright side in GM food but I couldn't find that. Don't have a positive part in GM food? Is it a truth? I want to discuss about positive part in GM food without economics part. Because I have a information in economics part from the Internet.
I agree with Seok won that GM foods tend to be more business way and also talk about how strange they can do with foods? big? small? no seeds? square shape?
It seems everyone wrote almost everything what I'm thinking haha! Anyway, as far as I'm concerned scientist should take responsibility about chemical ingredients as well as explore an evidences to guarantee our foods. In addition, I'm wondered how come GM foods are allowed to import and export in many countries without checking the effect of foods. However, personally, I think I consume GM foods everyday. As long as no one die because of GM foods, it should be alright. in less wealthy consumer's angers, it might feed all their family. Consequently, it might reduce the rate of malnutrition and hunger problems. Nothing much we can do but at least we're aware of foods and I bet after you watch this video you'll be more considerable. That's a good start to be educated consumer, isn't it?
I think GMF is serious essential to describe in the world, actually in Japan in my country, we don't identify which is GMF or not and it is had to say that we can eat safety in the future or ever lasting. However, some scientist say it is not dangerous like nuclear pollution food. Almost I would say is that if we did not eat this, every product would be disappear so that according to Japanese government, some politician think that they continue to argue.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI think GM foods that we eat have some problems relating to environment and health for humans etc. If they are labeled and treated as a charity for poor people or animals, these problems will be able to improve more and more. Moreover an expert on GM food should play a role in notifying people about GM foods.
DeleteInteresting thoughts, Sora. Thanks for your comment.
Deletegood point, it should be label so people will know what in the pack
DeleteBut I think it's hard to find that where is it start to be GM? For example, we're not directly receive chemical things but it comes from many ways such as meat, eegs, soya and milk. So it incredibly risks to make mistakes from labelling the products. Do u think?
DeleteIt was really surprising that we don't know what we are eating. It is GM food or natural food that was scary and little worry about health. My option would be to ask them to label that so people will know what they are eating even if that GM food is large amount of production and it is in everyday use.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI agree, Zia. Labelling GM food would make it much clearer for 'us' the consumers...Thanks for your comment.
ReplyDeleteI'm completely disagree with GM food. I don't like eat "chemical" food.
ReplyDeleteI come from a traditionalist family that likes to eat food of own production without adding of "medicines".
The only one positive thing that I can find on GM food is that some food can be exported in places where the production is poor.
You are right, Vincenzo, home-grown food is the best.
DeleteThank you for your comments.
As I see it, to a large extent the GM food can promote the agricultural economics efficiently. According to the video, the transgenic technology is aim to save the growing cycle of plants, which has a considerable impact on the agriculture and market. Speeding the pace of growth would provide more products to market than nowadays. There is undoubted that it has the potential to solve hunger crisis that is happening in some poor area such as Africa.However,the opponents always draw public's attention to the safety of GM food.
ReplyDeleteYes, the safety of the GM food is one thing. There's another problem, I believe. It would be great if GM food could be the solution for Africa. The fact is, however, most support for Africa seems to end up in wrong hands.
DeleteThanks for your comment, Khun.
It seems to me it is a counter-argument, because one of the advantages is it could provide more nutrition than unmodified foods, such as, vitamin. On the other hand, it possible to cause an unexpected allergen or allergic reaction.
ReplyDeleteYes, that's true. I think we need more research. Thank you for your comments, Khalid.
DeleteAfter watched this films, I have been thinking about positive part in GM food like Kun. Because scientist was thinking when they did researching. So I tried looking for bright side in GM food but I couldn't find that. Don't have a positive part in GM food? Is it a truth? I want to discuss about positive part in GM food without economics part. Because I have a information in economics part from the Internet.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Seok won that GM foods tend to be more business way and also talk about how strange they can do with foods? big? small? no seeds? square shape?
DeleteIt seems everyone wrote almost everything what I'm thinking haha! Anyway, as far as I'm concerned scientist should take responsibility about chemical ingredients as well as explore an evidences to guarantee our foods. In addition, I'm wondered how come GM foods are allowed to import and export in many countries without checking the effect of foods. However, personally, I think I consume GM foods everyday. As long as no one die because of GM foods, it should be alright. in less wealthy consumer's angers, it might feed all their family. Consequently, it might reduce the rate of malnutrition and hunger problems. Nothing much we can do but at least we're aware of foods and I bet after you watch this video you'll be more considerable. That's a good start to be educated consumer, isn't it?
ReplyDeleteCorrect myself lol.... an evidence in 2 lines... Thx u! :D
DeleteI think GMF is serious essential to describe in the world, actually in Japan in my country, we don't identify which is GMF or not and it is had to say that we can eat safety in the future or ever lasting.
ReplyDeleteHowever, some scientist say it is not dangerous like nuclear pollution food.
Almost I would say is that if we did not eat this, every product would be disappear so that according to Japanese government, some politician think that they continue to argue.